DOGE Shouldn't Unilaterally Disarm if There's Room for Reform

The Case for Reforming Federal Agencies
DOGE shouldn't unilaterally disarm; rather, it must strategically embrace reform amidst an unsustainable fiscal trajectory. With the federal government spending $6.8 trillion in FY 2024, a substantial reform approach is crucial. This spending, at 23.4 percent of GDP, highlights the urgent need for action. In comparison, the deficits reached $1.8 trillion, underscoring the necessity of change.
Rethinking Agency Roles in Reform
Opponents may suggest outright elimination of big agencies like the Department of Education. However, such actions might be counterproductive. Instead, DOGE should leverage existing bureaucracy to push forward with reforms. Audits of all federal programs and regulations must be prioritized, while agency evaluations will help identify inefficiencies.
Implementing Effective Oversight
- Federal agencies should assess their operations and expenditures.
- The importance of accountability in spending recipients must be recognized.
- Only those agencies willing to engage in self-analysis should remain under DOGE's oversight.
Ultimately, income spent and lost potentials are just as significant as uncollected revenues. For actual reform success, DOGE's reforms must be enforced by the very agencies that oversee compliance.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.